Daniella Bartfeld

Daniella Bartfeld (b. 1974) is the founding director of the Aliyah Organization Zionist diplomatic project. Daniella Bartfeld is a Swedish-Israeli neoconservative intellectual with focus on affecting change in the Middle East through influencing international diplomatic action. Daniella moved to Israel in 1994, formally made Aliyah (immigrated to Israel) in 1995 and returned to Sweden in 1997. Daniella’s dream is to move back to Israel, yet has effectively been unable to do so due to disability.    

Daniella is endowed with prodigious abilities in the six following areas: 1) extraordinarily advanced problem-solving skills which usually function in an intuitive and instant fashion (the eureka effect), 2) extreme ability for intellectually understanding how others think, 3) sophisticated ability for seeing the gigantic (not just “the big”) picture in everything that interests her, 4) being able to quickly find the needle in the haystack so to speak, i.e. rapidly identifying what is absolutely pivotal to the question at hand whether from existing data or by innovation, 5) especially advanced perceptive logical (specifically non-logocentric) radar in detecting logic in seemingly non-logical contexts and 6) superior perspective-taking capability. These abilities are fully integrated with each other and effectively function as one superability. However, it is uncertain how operational they are without hyperfocus.  

Due to her advanced cognitive skills, Daniella as a diplomatic blogger is uniquely politically influential for a private citizen in the world of diplomacy and has been so since 2002. Daniella’s daily writings are carefully monitored by governments around the world. As someone often influential in shaping diplomacy and particularly so pertaining to the Middle East, Daniella always makes instant intuitive decisions about what to write and her decisions never turn out wrong although there are sometimes inadvertent consequences in real life. Daniella discovered core Median Judaism c. 2002 and managed to prove and document it in the period of 2014-2016 and this is now known to all governments although not yet to the general public. Daniella has a long history of advocacy for the Kurdistani-Israeli-American triangular relationship as an independent Kurdistan (in parts of Kurdistan) has been a key objective of Israeli regional policy since 1958.

While Daniella applies her advanced cognitive skills mainly in the realm of diplomatic advocacy, her abilities can be applied in any field of knowledge that she is familiar with and personally interested in – she does not need to be an expert. Daniella personally thinks that it is really a shame that her advanced abilities are not put to use in other fields than diplomatic advocacy since her extreme talent really is not limited to the realm of diplomatic advocacy. Daniella’s hopes that in the future she would collaboratively help scientists and intelligence scientists resolve ostensibly “irresoluble” scientific problems that they themselves are currently unable to resolve.

What could Daniella attain outside of diplomatic advocacy and helping scientists and intelligence scientists resolve ostensibly “irresoluble” problems? Considering Daniella’s extremely impressive achievements in diplomatic advocacy, Daniella’s mind really is a human black box and Daniella might even have further latent prodigious abilities than the aforementioned six prodigious abilities. Most of Daniella’s time is spent surfing the Internet hoping to find inspiration for blogging and intellectual exploration. There is really no question that Daniella’s prodigious skills could be put to much more an better use in further fields. What is required for Daniella becoming able to resolve advanced problems in yet further fields of knowledge? The fundamental requirement is Daniella becoming interested in the subject matter at hand and so proactively stimulating Daniella into becoming so is thus necessary before she can resolve such ostensibly irresoluble problems unless of course she is already interested. Daniella has a dialogical “chavruta” personality in the sense that dialogue with others helps her resolve difficult problems. Daniella relies on dialogue with others to move forward in her intellectual processes. Why is this so? Daniella picks up on clues and she finds clues in arguments of others. Similarly, she surfs the internet looking for clues for her various intellectual ventures. However, sometimes in the absence of someone to dialogue with, she has been able to dialogue with herself by talking to herself in finding clues in her own arguments although this is much much less creative. 

What are the genetic and familial origins of Daniella’s unique abilities? Daniella has seen a family photograph with her Yiddish-speaking Austro-Hungarian paternal grandfather (born 1892 near Chernivtsi, present Ukraine) dressed in military parade uniform with his chest filled with Austro-Hungarian imperial/royal orders (grand stars), yet with no military medals. Daniella’s father told Daniella that her paternal grandfather was decorated by the emperor of Austria-Hungary. Daniella’s own particularly advanced cognitive abilities, the multiple imperial/royal orders, the military parade uniform and the absence of military medals strongly suggest that he was an intelligence world hereditary genius and senior official during WWI in the Evidenzbureau, Austro-Hungarian military intelligence which was only abolished with the dissolution of Austria-Hungary at the end of WWI in 1918. Furthermore, Daniella has an Israeli cousin (a son of the sister of Daniella’s father) who is an apparent genius and senior corporate executive in Silicon Valley. This means that the genius genes are not inherited patrilineally like in the Bach and Rothschild families. Furthermore, Daniella’s father despite being a polyglot who spoke seven languages fluently was certainly not a genius or at least did not develop into one. When in contact with senior Israeli intelligence officials many years ago, they did not seem particularly surprised at Daniella’s genius as Daniella’s paternal grandfather undoubtedly began working for Israeli intelligence when immigrating to Israel upon the founding of the state in 1948. No one in Daniella’s family told her about her grandfather’s profession in Israel. Daniella’s paternal grandfather died in Israel with the three citizenships of Austria, Romania and Israel and retained Austrian citizenship despite living in Romania after the dissolution of Austria-Hungary. 

Affective empaths are generally known as “empaths” and are an established online community (e.g. they have 100+ facebook groups) and are characterized by their inability to prevent unwanted massive introjection of emotions of adjacent others, they strongly experience emotions of others to a degree that is both intrusive and painful, i.e. an extreme form of emotional contagion. Cognitive empaths are an entirely different phenomenon and are probably only present in families with autistic traits. Cognitive empaths have in part advanced cognitive empathy without experiencing extreme emotional contagion. The distinction between affective empaths and cognitive empaths is essential because of the distinction between affective empathy and cognitive empathy which are processed in different parts of the brain. The similarity between cognitive empaths and the Dark Triad is the disparity between the levels of affective empathy and cognitive empathy. Those on the Dark Triad have low affective empathy and normal cognitive empathy.

Daniella’s mother (b. 1936) is an intuitive cognitive empath which is also expressed in the ability of being able to in very advanced ways intellectually explain social contexts that she was never part of, after having been provided with very little information and not knowing the persons involved. Daniella’s mother is not an affective empath as she is not overwhelmed by emotions of others but is rather a cognitive empath. Daniella’s mother is able to understand personalities of those whom she encounters, based apparently on particularly advanced mindreading capacity. Daniella’s mother is aware of non-exhibited emotions of others without usually experiencing them as her own, an advanced ability that Daniella does not have although Daniella mildly mirrors strong emotions in others such as through a sense of discomfort. Daniella’s mother has a dizygotic twin sister who is also able to read personalities and she furthermore is able to introjectively understand emotions of animals although cognitively so and is thus also an intuitive cognitive empath. Daniella has an high IQ autistic friend who is a cognitive empath who also has non-autistic family members with autistic traits who are also cognitive empaths and Daniella therefore knows that cognitive empaths is certainly not a phenomenon limited to her own family although cognitive empaths is a subject that remains to be studied by science. 

Daniella too, is an intuitive cognitive empath but is focused on collective thought patterns. Daniella as a cognitive empath is focused on how collective entities operate cognitively; specifically governments and extremists. In adult life Daniella had no particular interest in deeply analyzing individuals such as persons whom she meets. It is thus always on a distance and always collective entities. Daniella thus uses her gift ethically in avoiding applying it on individuals whom she encounters. Daniella is simply not very interested in profoundly understanding the thoughts of those whom she encounters. Daniella’s gift is similar to her mother’s ability, yet Daniella unfortunately has not been told about the specific cognitive abilities of her paternal grandfather.

While Daniella’s being a cognitive empath is obviously derived from her mother’s side (Daniella’s father was quite autistically impaired in understanding the thinking of others in him being involved in quite many misunderstandings throughout his life) are the other extreme abilities undoubtedly derived from Daniella’s father’s side. Daniella is diagnosed with (high-functioning) autism, severe ADHD, (managed, medicated and symptom-free) schizoaffective disorder (an intermediary condition between bipolar disorder and schizofrenia) and gender dysphoria. There is no indication that Daniella’s extreme abilities are derived from her diagnosed conditions. Why is this so? While some of Daniella’s prodigious skills could hypothetically be associated with autism and ADHD, the others are not and this certainly does not account for the exceptionally high and even level of all Daniella’s extremely advanced cognitive skills which strongly suggests an X factor, namely hereditary genius which indeed also appears to be present in Daniella’s family. However, it is extremely likely that the underlying creativity inherent in her medicated schizoaffective disorder contributes quite significantly to her diplomatic advocacy as do generally her strong abilities (so-called “superpowers”) as derived from her autism and her ADHD as described in the following: 

Daniella has the full spectrum of cognitive advantages (12 traits, as described by Anders Hansen 2017) that are associated with ADHD: Takes initiatives prolifically, is a force of nature and gets things done, is creative and thinks outside the box, is energetic with unlimited energy [on things that she is hyperfocused on], is fearless and pursues new ideas, is curious, is flexible, is good at hyperfocus, is persistent and does not give up, is intuitive and questioning, is excellent at lateral thinking [i.e. views things from new perspectives] and is not deterred by setbacks and adversity. 

Daniella has the full range of cognitive advantages associated with high-functioning autism (12 traits, as described by Harriet Cannon 2018). Daniella thus has attention to detail (thoroughness & accuracy), deep focus (concentration & freedom from distraction), observational skills (listen, look, learn approach & fact finding), absorbs and retains facts (excellent long term memory & superior recall), visual skills (visual learning and recall & detail-focused), expertise (in-depth knowledge & high level of skills), methodical approach (analytical & spotting patterns, repetitions), novel approaches (unique thought processes & innovative solutions), creativity (distinctive imagination & expression of ideas), tenacity and resilience (determination & challenges opinions), accepting of difference (less likely to judge others & may question norms) and integrity (honesty, loyalty & commitment).

There are three types of ADHD: 1) Hyperactive and impulsive type ADHD, 2) Inattentive type ADHD and 3) Combined type ADHD. Daniella belongs to the second type, formerly known as ADD which is characterized by concentration problems, i.e. when she is not hyperfocused. Daniella has autism level 1 which is the most high-functioning of the three levels of ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder). ASD level 1 was (along with level 2) until 2013 formerly officially known as Asperger syndrome. Level 3 constitutes those autistic persons who have intellectual disabilities, formerly known as “mentally retarded”. Daniella’s disabilities are invisible and Daniella seems completely normal aside from being extremely open and highly verbal with much to tell, something which most people find interesting and stimulating.

Both Daniella’s parents developed autistic traits (in both cases communication deficits) leading to clinical ASD in Daniella. In the case of Daniella’s father were the communication deficits leading to misunderstandings so severe that he most likely would have qualified for an autism diagnosis. Daniella’s father was a law-abiding intelligent psychopath but his psychopathy was substantially ameliorated by his autism to the effect that he was never exploitative or intentionally mean although in effect impossible to live with and of course a terrible parent although at the same time a very nice person. However, it may sound paradoxical but considering that he was a psychopath Daniella’s father’s personality due to the autism was rather benign.

Daniella’s thinking is not only outside the box but is typically characterized by being entirely outside any and all paradigms. Daniella is somewhat critical of academia in the sense that there you are not only expected to think in terms of paradigms but also be a footnote epigone. Daniella considers this obsession with excessively quoting others mere socially accepted plagiarism and being expressive of lack of original thinking. Daniella believes that highly creative people should be encouraged to become scientific scholars as this would dramatically increase the quality of scientific output. Daniella herself has encyclopedic memory for pivotal details due to her autism and has as an adult mostly derived her knowledge from the Internet since she is distracted by the fibers in the paper in printed books due to her ADHD. Writing footnotes never worked for Daniella since she connects dots from distant memory and this disability is apparently due to a deficit in her executive function which is either because of her autism or her ADHD or both. Another way of putting this is that Daniella simply connects (or processes) pieces of information in a different way than neurotypicals. Daniella has learned to exclusively focus on those skills in which she excels and strictly avoid those functions in which she is impaired. Concentration problems in ADHD have been described as there being only things that are interesting and things that are not interesting with no gray zone in between and that is certainly so for Daniella which makes her filter out everything deemed irrelevant. This makes it almost impossible for Daniella to read something that she does not find interesting which in practice created insurmountable problems for her while a university student.

One of the main underlying dysfunctions in autism is deficit in Theory of Mind (ToM), as ToM produces cognitive empathy. Autistic people generally have highly individually unique (idiosyncratic) ToMs and better ToM abilities in autistic persons correlate with higher IQ in suggesting that the higher IQ the better use do autistic people have of their ToMs. Daniella’s particularly advanced cognitive empathy is atypical for autism and the only deficit in ToM that she herself (subjectively) experiences is her complete inability to respond interactively to flirtation. (She has been diagnosed twice with autism so the diagnosis is not in doubt.) While all autistic peoples have deficits in their ToMs do cognitive empaths also have “surpluses” in their ToMs, meaning that they have in some respects more advanced ToMs than neurotypicals.

There is an ongoing debate in the autistic community whether autism should primarily be conceptualized as neurodiversity, as a superpower or as a deficit. This debate is highly contentious and there is no agreement on the terms. Some autistic people are offended by the term “deficit” although Daniella is not as she clearly experiences a “deficit” in ToM with regard to flirtation. Some autistic people are offended by the term “superpowers” for strong abilities in people with autism and ADHD which they regard as “trivializing” their own disabilities. Furthermore, some 37% of all autistic people have savant skills. Then there is the term “neurodiversity” which regards autism and ADHD as “differences” and which is at odds with pathologicalization and therefore also implicitly the notion of autism and ADHD as diagnosed disabilities. Daniella recognizes her autism and ADHD as neurodiversity, superpower and deficit at the same time yet acknowledges that for many autistic individuals it is exclusively a deficit and neither neurodiversity nor superpower.

Daniella’s diplomatic advocacy is enabled not only by her advanced cognitive abilities but also by her hyperfocus (due to both autism and ADHD), her proactive ADHD/autistic strong abilities (“superpowers”) and by her highly focused creativity stemming from the suppressed mania of her medicated and symptom-free schizoaffective disorder. 

Daniella is an empathetic animal liberationist and cannot watch Holocaust movies without crying hysterically. Daniella is easily moved to tears when experiencing compassion or something else that she is moved by. While many of those on the Dark Triad derive pleasure from harming others, Daniella derives pleasure from helping others. It is notable that neither Daniella nor her mother feels pity, yet are highly rationally compassionate. However, Daniella has only contempt for pity which typically is compassion without prior experience, ethics and reason. For Daniella does not compassion make sense unless it is anchored in prior experience, reason and ethics. Daniella’s mother has a different rationale for opposing pity in claiming that it is condescending. Daniella’s mother’s female dizygothic twin also opposes pity and does not understand why anyone would feel pity. Daniella does not see this autistic absence as a deficit in her ToM as Daniella is highly rationally compassionate (as are her mother and aunt) as she views this absence as a strength only because she is much less amenable to moralistic manipulation. Similar to those on the Dark Triad but due to her ADHD does Daniella get a kick out of exercise of power (because of temporary infusion of dopamine), albeit only in the realm of international politics. As comparable to persons on the Dark Triad does Daniella leverage her advanced ability to understand how others think for power purposes although not so in personal life (she did so however as a child in close cooperation with her mother to overcome bullying in 4th grade in elementary school) and strictly so in the realm of international politics.

How is Daniella’s personality? The most common psychometric framework for studying personalities are the Big Five Personality Traits which are then subdivided into what are known as ‘facets’, i.e. personality subtraits.

Big Five personality traits in Daniella


Anxiety: Daniella sometimes experiences mild anxiety at home while intermittently experiencing mild anticipatory anxiety while outside her home.

Hostility: Daniella is almost never hostile to anyone in private life as Daniella almost never gets angry and this is a trait inherited from her mother. However, Daniella is on occasion quite hostile and aggressive in her diplomatic advocacy.

Depression: Daniella has experienced post-psychotic depression and was also depressed after becoming traumatized in basic training in the IDF (Israel Defense Forces). Daniella can be depressed for an hour or less and this occurs perhaps once a month.

Self-Consciousness: Daniella has a high degree of private self-consciousness in being extremely well aware of herself. As regards public self-consciousness Daniella has little interest in how others view her but at least she is happy that others are not envious of her.

Impulsiveness: Daniella acts on her intuition when shopping and blogging (in her diplomatic advocacy) and her intuition does not fail her.

Vulnerability: Daniella is normally not vulnerable IRL but can be so post-psychosis. However Daniella suffers in online contexts only from what is informally known as “Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria” (RSD) and this is probably related to her ADHD, meaning that Daniella is often afraid of being rejected/abandoned while chatting online due to not feeling affirmed through introjection by means of emotional contagion and she also overreacts to public discussions online in that she is completely consumed by almost any public online discussion in which she is involved in needing to provide that perfect rebuttal. Daniella is usually trying to please while chatting online in order so as not trigger displeasure on the other side. Public online discussions trigger Daniella’s brain extensively and she compulsively needs to come up with the perfect, comprehensive response. Daniella is also extremely sensitive to public online criticism and it would therefore not be suitable for her to become a public figure. This is quite peculiar because Daniella is quite thick-skinned IRL.

Irritability: Daniella is virtually never irritated.

Insecurity: Daniella experiences emotional security at home but frequently emotional insecurity in public space.

Emotionality: Daniella is friendly but otherwise not very emotional.


Warmth: Daniella is warm but not extremely warm.

Gregariousness: Daniella is not attracted to groups and group activities yet is highly social, mostly in activities of two.

Assertiveness: Daniella is extremely assertive and successfully so.

Activity: Daniella is active when hyperfocus is on but otherwise not.

Excitement-seeking: Daniella seeks mostly intellectual and sexual excitement.

Positive Emotions: Daniella mostly experiences positive emotions in the context of her diplomatic advocacy and explorative intellectual activities.

Sociability: Daniella is sociable at a normal level.

Unrestraint: Daniella is a person who acts spontaneously and intuitively, yet within reason.

Activity-Adventurousness: Daniella is intellectually adventurous and adventurous in her diplomatic advocacy yet not in her private life.


Fantasy / Imagination-Creativity: Daniella’s fantasy/creativity/imagination appears mostly in two fields, 1) highly focused intellectual innovation/problem-solving/detection and 2) humor as she has a past of writing humoristic satirical political pornography in the French subversive revolutionary tradition. 

Aesthetics: Daniella has advanced talent for dance, modern art and poetry but has so far shown little active appreciation for the arts although she enjoys passively listening to music.

Feelings: Daniella is moderately open to feelings.

Action: Daniella is extremely action-oriented in her diplomatic advocacy, but not elsewhere in life.

Ideas: Daniella is highly critical of ideas.

Values: Daniella challenges values that are not consistent with the facts.

Intellect: Daniella has a highly agile intellect and although typically extremely critical of thoughts of others, does she of course on occasion take inspiration from published insights of others. Daniella has the experience already since before commencing primary school as an intellectually precocious child of having won almost every argument that she engages in, including with teachers at university. This is because Daniella is more logical than every other person that she has held a discussion with. While Daniella listens carefully to views of others, does she in practice usually not hold those in high regard due her having superior logical and other intellectual faculties.

Perceptiveness: Daniella is extremely perceptive.


Trust: Daniella nearly always trusts others IRL unlike in geopolitics, yet is not naive.

Straightforwardness: Daniella is straightforward in social relations but is the opposite of straightforward when it comes to romance and sexuality.

Altruism: Daniella is highly altruistic, albeit not naively so.

Compliance: Daniella is extremely compliant with the wishes of others and is virtually always happy to be of help within the bounds of reason.

Modesty: Daniella is a modest person although not self-depreciating.

Tender-mindedness: Daniella is tender-minded at a normal level.

Affection: Daniella is affectionate to a normal degree.

Gentleness: Daniella is highly gentle.

Generosity: Daniella is generous in helping Israel and Israel’s allies though diplomatic advocacy without enumeration but rarely provides gifts and does not give to charity.

Modesty-Humility: Daniella is the opposite of humble in her diplomatic advocacy as she is extremely ambitious and the only thing that holds her back is lack of inspiration.


Competence: Daniella is extremely competent at her diplomatic advocacy.

Dutifulness: Daniella is almost not dutiful at all, even her diplomatic advocacy is not motivated by duty but rather by the passion of advancing the interests of the State of Israel and by extension overlapping interests of Israel’s strategic allies. However, Daniella experiences a sense of duty to protect the Kurds and not only because it serves Israel’s and America’s interests which it certainly does. This is 1) because Israel’s traditional role is to protect and support the Kurds, 2) because most Kurds are strongly pro-Israel, 4) because a third of all Kurds are Median Jews (Alawites, Alevis, Yarsanis and Yezidis) and 5) because of millennia of strong ties between the two peoples. Daniella also feels obliged to procreate so as to transmit her hereditary genius to the next generation. 

Achievement-striving: Daniella is extremely ambitious in her diplomatic advocacy and intellectual exploration but not otherwise.

Self-discipline: Daniella has no self-discipline (i.e. the ability to intentionally reshape oneself), yet has no vices other than some issues with procrastination and compensates for the lack of self-discipline with hyperfocus.

Deliberation: Daniella rarely engages in political deliberation as she virtually always makes intuitive decisions in her diplomatic advocacy. 

Orderly/Order: Daniella is not orderly at all.

Decisiveness-Consistency: Daniella scores extremely high, particularly in her diplomatic advocacy.

Reliability: Daniella is moderately reliable because ultimately she typically does not hold views of others in very high regard.

Industriousness: Daniella is diligent in intellectual endeavors involving hyperfocus, including diplomatic advocacy.

As an autistic person is Daniella very highly sincere and very honest, she only very rarely tells lies in private life; is skeptical of rhetoric which she rarely uses and which she considers at best a tool for manipulation and at worst a vehicle for disinformation and she never deliberately misinforms or manipulates in her diplomatic advocacy. Daniella’s experience is that very strictly telling the truth from the perspective and interests of the addressee is the very best communication policy. Daniella is very unselfish and experiences severe difficulties in pursuing her own personal interests such as promoting her own economic interests. While it is true that Daniella has achieved an extreme degree of highly realistic self-awareness, Daniella is a modest person who is not interested in publicity, public attention or public recognition for her personal achievements.

Research is inconsistent as to whether autistics also have deficits in affective empathy. Some studies show that autistic people vary greatly in their respective levels of affective empathy. Other studies indicate that autistic people empathize with emotions of positive valence but not with emotions of negative valence. People on the Dark Triad in contrast have low affective empathy and normal cognitive empathy.

Daniella has a poor emotional life with very little emotion which is usually low-intensity in nature she but does not suffer from alexithymia (subclinical deficiency in understanding, processing or describing emotions) as Daniella has no problem with identifying and describing emotions whether her own or those of others. Furthermore, Daniella suffers neither from anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure) nor from apathy or reduced affect display (condition of reduced emotional reactivity). However, Daniella does experience introjection of emotions of others, although usually at a low level of intensity. Daniella knows this because she experiences more emotions in the company of others than alone when she is typically almost void of emotions. What is the origin of Daniella’s weak experience of emotion? Since this condition is not hitherto known to science, the only explanation is that this is a key feature of Daniella’s hereditary genius. This is extremely conducive to superlogical thinking since Daniella is thus not confused by intrusive emotions. Furthermore, although Daniella is a calculating geopolitician, Daniella is no monster and those on the Dark Triad do have normal emotions and are certainly not weak in emotions like Daniella albeit they lack certain emotions such as remorse which Daniella certainly does have.

However, Daniella experiences very strong rational empathic concern for others in easily becoming teary eyed when watching emotionally touching filmed experiences of others. Witnessing extreme suffering such as in Holocaust films and documentaries about the Animal Industry elicits hysterical crying in Daniella. Daniella thus experiences strong anxiety and discomfort in response to witnessing extreme suffering in others. Daniella once fully legally visited a mink farm as part of an official delegation from Sweden’s largest animal rights organization (Djurens Rätt) and cried when witnessing the suffering of the minks incarcerated in small cages. The cruel incarceration led to horrible stereotypical behaviors in the minks. It may thus be concluded that although Daniella normally does not experience much emotions is she certainly capable of experiencing strong emotions. There is however one context where Daniella always experiences strong emotion and that is while in forests. Biologists have documented that plants such as trees have feelings and nerves although they lack cognitive centers to themselves experience those feelings. However, we as animals can apparently introject those feelings (most people report feeling refreshed after walking in forests) and Daniella strongly does from trees.

Daniella became an ethical vegan in 1997 after taking note of the similarities in the treatment of the victims in the Holocaust and the Animal industry such as 1) race-based supremacist ideology (homo sapiens sapiens is a race/subspecies), 2) medical experiments on enslaved individuals, 3) killing millions in gas chambers, 4) the use of concentration facilities for purposes of economic exploitation, 5) technically legal mass crimes, 6) long cruel transportation without food and water, 7) mass economic enslavement of many victims long before execution and 8) industrialized mass murder. After all, Jews during the Holocaust were treated as so-called “mere animals”. Indeed, the Holocaust was modeled on the Animal industry. However, the gargantuan number of victims (billions, not millions), the extent of the suffering and extent of the de facto crimes in the Animal industry are so incomparably vast that generally comparing the two as singular historical events would be inappropriate. Daniella strongly and proudly supports the leaderless grassroots Animal Liberation Front (ALF) as the Nuremberg Trials established that it should be obvious to all that certain acts are criminal despite being technically legal and so there is nothing more noble than resisting such heinous crimes. The global ALF heroically liberates captive enslaved exploited animal individuals and causes some property damage in the process but never harms humans.

Daniella’s explanation for the Holocaust, the Animal Industry and Slavery is that human compassion is both selective and discursive. Humans will simply never care about everyone, but will just extend compassion and moral concern to some individuals and some collectives. Furthermore, human collective compassion is dressed in discourse which is problematic as discourse is precisely what underlies and normalizes phenomena such as the Holocaust, the Animal Industry and Slavery. Slavery was considered perfectly normal to most pre-Civil War 19th century Southern White Americans, deportations of Jews was considered perfectly normal to most Germans during the Holocaust and the eating and wearing of animal products is still considered perfectly normal to most humans. In all three cases the same exact psychological mechanisms are at play. This applies to Daniella as well who mercilessly and in panic kills innocent insects and spiders whom she finds in her home rather than transferring them unharmed back into nature.

How should one relate to non-vegans? Most of them do not personally commit crimes against animals other than killing insects and spiders (which Daniella does as well) but they are at the same time guilty due complicity in horrendous crimes due to creating consuming demand for completely immoral products from the Animal industry and passively tolerating practices such as torture for scientific experimental purposes. It is very difficult to persuade most non-vegans that what they are doing is immoral since they don’t want to admit to lacking moral integrity. Deep-down do they know the truth but they don’t want to acknowledge it because of the consequences for their own personal identity. After all, who would want to admit to being a bad person? The Jewish concept of tinok shenishba (“captured infant”) is applicable here since small children all start out pro-vegan and are then brainwashed to tolerate products stemming from animal abuse. It is useful to strategically regard most non-vegans as essentially innocent children who must be persuaded through emotional manipulation such as serving them delicious vegan food rather than being persuaded through hard argumentation which they in most cases are not open to. 

Daniella is extremely successful at influencing international actors (and in particular the US government) by appealing to their own interests without manipulating them and of course that is the essence of diplomacy, what is less usual is to do this through blogging in a calculated manner for power effects. One may even wonder why such calculated “blogger diplomacy” is almost entirely absent in the online world? Yet, Daniella has a realist view of international politics as based on self-interested actors with subjective formulations of their overlapping respective national interests. Nevertheless, this realist Weltanschauung is grounded in democratic values as Daniella is keenly aware of how dangerous foreign policy realism is without being grounded in the values of democracy. 

What is Daniella’s perspective on mass suffering that she has been indirectly complicit in causing in the Middle East for the past two decades? Daniella is informed by the rabbinic insight that those who are good to evil people will eventually become evil to good people. While this adage may be construed as a simplistic Manichean worldview this is not the case. The rabbinic adage certainly does not suggest being cruel to evil people, rather it recognizes both the existence of collective evil (e.g. totalitarianism) and the Dark Triad which cannot be treated leniently. Daniella experiences no remorse for inadvertent suffering in the Middle East that she has become complicit in since the early 2000s. This is in contrast to personal mistakes of hers in life for which she does experience remorse. It is no exaggeration to say that Daniella lives according to Nietzschean Master Morality as she is involved in the Zionist revolution (transvaluation) of morals where Israel actively deconstructs Master-Slave Morality by means of Israeli regional policy.

Daniella recognizes that the Middle East presents a difficult and complex reality for Israel, America and their regional allies to navigate and so necessary decisions invariably have unwanted and inadvertent consequences which are often unpredictable. Furthermore, the region is extraordinarily complex with a very difficult political culture. You are frequently damned if you do and damned if you don’t. The problem of facing irrational adversaries is partly irresoluble and is pervasive in some areas of the Asian parts of the greater Middle East despite the fact that most governments in Islamdom are highly rational. 

The problem with the Palestinians involves the utmost danger of empowering a locally weak (but internationally powerful) enemy with clear and present, pervasive genocidal intent. Experience shows that empowering the Palestinians only aggravates the conflict and has the tragic effect of exacerbating their own suffering. Conventional solutions do not apply as a hypothetical two-state solution (which could only be achieved by further unilateral Israeli withdrawal due to Palestinian rejectionism) would lead to significantly worse conflict and subsequent inevitable reoccupation. A one-state solution (without Median Jewish mass immigration in the tens of millions) would inevitably lead to a second Holocaust against the Jewish people considering that the Palestinians are the most Anti-Semitic people in the world with a transferist political consensus of completely removing the Jews from Israel. The Palestinian leadership has always recognized that there is nowhere to deport the Jews and has thus always been intent on an eliminationist agenda. Even if demographically feasible, mass immigration of predominantly Anti-Semitic populations is decidedly not in the interest of the restored indigenous Jewish state.

Since there are tens of millions of Median Jews (in the Middle East Alawites, Alevis, Alians, Bektashis, Druze, Khaksaris, Shabaks, Yarsanis and Yezidis) with possibly as many as 20 million Median Jews in Turkey (of whom approximately 16 million are Alevis) with another 8 million Median Jews elsewhere in the Middle East (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Iran) and also Median Jews in China (Qiang peoples) and Africa (Maasai and non-Christian Igbos), would Israel annex the entire Judea and Samaria after at least some 10 million Median Jews have immigrated to Israel, and Jordan would subsequently annex Gaza with an underground road and railroad connection being constructed under the Israeli Negev desert between Gaza and the East Bank.

Daniella identifies as a democratic realist and understands the vital importance to all free societies (including certainly to Israel and Sweden) of maintaining a strong America in global affairs. Daniella has a family connection to the United States as her maternal grandfather lived in the United States for many years and most likely became a US citizen. Daniella has however over the years certainly become less idealist and more realist. International politics of course is a bear pit and Israel’s long-term survival takes precedence over almost any other concern. Ensuring Israel’s survival is a long-term preemptive task as Israel’s existence certainly cannot be taken for granted. Daniella has no compassion for Anti-Semites who seek to destroy the restored indigenous Jewish state and this attitude of hers is derived from the rabbinic insight that those who are good to evildoers will themselves become evil to good people. However, Daniella recognizes the importance of always maintaining as high ethical standards as the situation conceivably allows in dealing with Anti-Semitic enemy populations.

Daniella believes that realpolitik and promotion of democratic interests are absolutely compatible. In fact, the promotion of democratic interests often requires realpolitik. However it needs to be recognized that there is sometimes tension between realpolitik and democratic interests and sometimes the democratic interests of two democracies are conflicting. 

Daniella puts a premium on treating everyone well irrespective of group membership. Furthermore, Daniella is a conscientious ethical vegan and only buys clothes from major chains with ethical codes of conducts, meaning that they have a commitment to continual ethical advancement. How conscientious is Daniella in her diplomatic advocacy? Daniella is committed to democratic realism, i.e. a combination of promoting democratic interests and realpolitik. Realpolitik is not an ideal, rather it is unavoidable and of course there is no reason to be unnecessarily immoral. What is realpolitik from the perspective of democratic interests? Democracies must maintain relations with non-hostile dictatorships so that they do not turn hostile, this is required out of both economic and other necessity. How does Daniella relate to war? Daniella is what many would describe as a war hawk. Daniella understands that war is sometimes ethically required and necessary when the alternative is worse and does not shy away from advocating war, yet is keenly aware of its horrors. 

Does this mean that  Daniella is a cynic? No, Daniella views herself as clear-eyed and making clear choices whether advocating for necessary war when the alternative is worse or making as cruelty-free consumer choices as possible as this is about being as ethical as possible beyond conventional leftwing-rightwing dichotomies. What then about realpolitik, how can that be reconciled with conscience? This is about making the best possible choices without being unnecessarily immoral. The reality is that the majority of the world’s nations are not liberal democracies and it is incumbent upon free nations to maintain relations with them. This creates irreconcilable dilemmas and so while realpolitik is necessary in order to defend democratic interests must it again be emphasized that there is no reason to be needlessly immoral, but sometimes it is necessary to act in ways that defies conventional understanding of morality in order to defend democratic interests. Defending democratic interests is a very noble pursuit, yet the reality is that unnoble realpolitik must sometimes be deployed in defense of noble ends. The alternative is to not defend democratic interests and that is even more immoral and so the choice is clear.

Daniella strongly believes in the importance of defending and extending democracy yet finds conservatives cynical, liberals naive and socialists foolish and this is particularly true in foreign policy debates. What they share is that their imperialist/universalist epistemological claims originate in certain reinventions (often inversions) of Christian metaphysics. The greatest problem with those ideologies is that they are based on human supremacism in not only causing gargantuan suffering through the atrocious Animal Industry as a side effect of humanist racial supremacism (homo sapiens sapiens is a race/subspecies, not a species) but simultaneously destroying the planet and its irreplaceable diversity. The world is a highly dysfunctional place and the greatest hope is new technologies such as cellular agriculture (that will supplant the Animal Industry) and modification of the human genome (that will end personality disorders and will thus much reduce crime).

What are Daniella’s views on leftwing-rightwing debates? As a European and a disabled person does Daniella strongly support the welfare state which was created in broad agreement between left and right in Sweden and most other OECD nations. Daniella views the welfare state as an essential part of liberal democracy in providing cohesion and national solidarity between citizens, yet fully understands the importance of promoting innovation and entrepreneurship and removing red tape. Daniella is a feminist although opposed to misandric and transfobic forms of radical feminism. Daniella specifically is a technofeminist who supports development of feminist technologies such as household robots, artificial uteri and elimination of personality disorders which indirectly also disproportionately harms women. Despite being close in orientation to the US Republican party in foreign policy, Daniella obviously has no patience for the rampant transphobia in the Republican party, including among many American neoconservatives. 

However, it is nevertheless entirely undeniable that Daniella is what is known as a “neoconservative” in foreign policy matters, yet not otherwise. Of course the term is a misnomer (the term democratic realist is certainly preferable but unfortunately less intelligible) and neoconservatives have only made an original contribution to foreign policy debates and there is indeed a uniquely neoconservative realist Weltanschauung in international affairs centered on maintaining a strong America and defending as well as extending democracy where possible. Like other realists does Daniella recognize that the international system is inherently anarchic, yet Daniella does not pay credence to the myth of there being a unitary human nature, neither Lockean nor Hobbesian as the selfish anarchy in international affairs is due to the evolved and arbitrary design of the international so-called “system” itself. Psychometrists have long since documented the significant diversity in human psychological traits and personalities and the notion of there being a unitary human nature underpinning the international “system” is thus thoroughly debunked. 

Daniella recognizes the undeniable and particularly well-documented average intra-human racial differentiation in genotypic IQ which would not be a problem if the school system all over the world did not systematically discriminate against and stigmatize students with relatively lower IQs of all genetic origins. Both school grades and SAT scores measure IQ to a degree of 75% and there is no reason why students with comparatively lower IQs should be effectively barred from pursuing academic studies, something which is the case all over the world. The American school system is the main cause of the so-called “racial” problem in the United States just as the Swedish school system is the main cause of the eerily similar problem in Sweden. African Americans have an average IQ of 85, which incidentally is the same average IQ as that of the largely segregated Muslim immigrant population from the MENA region in Sweden. 

Daniella abhors and is strongly opposed to structural discrimination against individuals with relatively lower IQs irrespective of genetic origin and believes that abolishing the educational system’s absolute obsession with harming students with comparatively lower IQs of all genetic origins is key to attaining racial harmony in nations with communal strife. It is not derogatory to point out that one genetic group has a lower average genotypic IQ than another just as it is not derogatory to point out that one individual has a lower hereditary IQ than another individual. Those who consider it “derogatory” to point out the psychometrically well-established average group differences in IQ are the ones who are prejudiced since they apparently believe that individuals with lower IQs have less worth. Furthermore, there are persons with high IQs in genetic groups with comparatively lower average IQs and of course persons with low IQs in genetic groups with comparatively higher average IQs.

Daniella is goal-oriented, persistent, does not give up and is exceptionally and extremely successful in her diplomatic advocacy. How does Daniella’s diplomatic influence work? All nations have intelligence agencies and an important task for intelligence agencies is to gather all kinds of relevant information online that governments ultimately may find useful in condensed form. This certainly includes reading material that is important for devising foreign policy. Daniella’s articles are read directly after being published and are screened for relevance by intelligence monitors. Articles that are deemed relevant are relayed to diplomats and decision makers who at least in the United States make decisions whether to change policy within a day, something which Daniella usually finds out about through the Israeli online English-language media. In the past Daniella did not understand how her diplomatic influence worked and she descended into megalomania leading to psychotic episodes on several occasions in the past two decades. 

What are Daniella secrets in being so extremely influential? First, she does not merely think out of the box but out of the paradigms, second she is skilled at innovatively and creatively identifying and articulating national interests in groundbreaking ways, third she is extremely persuasive in arguing on the addressee’s own terms, fourth she fully deploys her six prodigious skills and fifth she uses her many autistic and ADHD superpowers to the full extent. 

Daniella scored 1.8 on SweSAT (Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test, officially known in Swedish as “Högskoleprovet”) and did not reach the maximum 2.0 due to completely failing the diagram section. The national average test score on SweSAT is 0.9. When she was being tested for IQ while being being diagnosed for autism she was not informed that there was a time limit for the test and that it was actually an intelligence test and so took great interest in questions that she could not resolve, with great focus and with no haste at all and therefore received what the administering psychologist described as a “low score” due to not completing the test. Scholastic Aptitude Tests (SATs) mostly measure IQ (to a degree of 75%) and a SweSAT score of 1.8 would likely be either MENSA-level or close to it since only 2,2% of test participants receive a test score of 1.8 or higher and this is particularly so considering that most students with lower IQs don’t take SATs simply due to not being interested in higher studies.

Daniella is sensorially oversensitive to light and sound due to her autism and thus does become easily exhausted due to sensory overload, i.e. experiences autistic fatigue. Like so many other autistic people, Daniella only has energy and focus for performing one major mission per day aside from issues which she deals with through hyperfocus. Because of her ADHD Daniella is completely disorganized in daily life, although she is hyperfocused on things that truly interests her. Due to her ADHD, Daniella finds it quite difficult to focus on reading entire printed books as she is distracted by the fibers in the paper, but she can read chapters in e-books if she finds them interesting enough. Daniella effectively ceased reading books at age 15 (she read prolifically up until that age) and has since then read relatively few books and thus mostly derived her knowledge from the Internet. Daniella has a short attention span except when hyperfocused on something that genuinely interests her and hyperfocus is on and this is due to her ADHD. Daniella has excellent self-confidence (she scored 30/30 on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) yet is plagued by intermittent self-doubt which is rather painful due to the persistent nature of the doubts. 

Because of her ADHD, Daniella has great difficulty following instructions such as acting upon received directions in the street or cooking according to a food recipe, although she was able to cook according to recipe as a child. Daniella is easily distracted because of her ADHD. Daniella finds it very difficult to learn things that she is not interested in and this is due to her ADHD. As a child she almost never did any homework as she found this quite painful, again due to her ADHD. At the same time does Daniella due to her autism have an encyclopedic memory. As a child she was an autistic “little professor” type of child. Daniella, unlike most high-functioning autistics, is not particularly interested in details (other than pivotal ones) but rather in the biggest possible picture although she is indeed excellent at remembering “pivotal details”. In late 2021 and due to her ADHD did she lose the ability to concentrate on watching movies and television series although she strangely regained the ability in August 2022. Due to her ADHD, Daniella suffers from low motivation for initiating tasks that don’t particularly interest her and she also procrastinates with regard to such tasks.

Autistic people are known to write differently from neurotypicals and that is certainly true of Daniella’s writings. What characterizes Daniella’s writing? This is somewhat difficult to pinpoint but the most poignant feature is that it is extremely persuasive to whom it is addressed. Daniella suffers from writing anxiety and when a few days has passed and she has not written a blog post does she fears that she will not ever have geopolitical ideas again, alternatively does she bizarrely fear that there would be no more need for her geopolitical ideas which would actually be an extremely happy scenario for Israel.

Because of her ADHD Daniella has a low tolerance for boredom which sometimes makes it frustrating when she has no ideas for writing. As a relatively young person at the turn of the millennium was Daniella’s dream to become a neoconservative intellectual and she is living the dream in self-actualization beyond even her wildest dreams two decades ago in often having an astounding influence over US foreign policy and sometimes over the foreign policies of other governments.

Daniella has due to her ADHD trouble copying with stress and is stressed out by small things in everyday life but only rarely in her diplomatic efforts. Due to her ADHD, Daniella finds it very stressful to wait for her turn or for a set time. Daniella is afflicted with time-blindness due to her ADHD which means that she is fleeting in an indeterminate time-sea and is then stressed out when the time is up. Because of her ADHD, Daniella has poor time management skills. Atypically for autistic people Daniella is stressed out by routines and set times. Daniella has irregular sleeping patterns as sleeping problems often are part of ADHD although this is a relatively recent problem of hers. Daniella has an undiagnosed sleeping disorder likely related to her ADHD.  

Daniella has a disability pension from the Swedish government augmented by a monthly housing benefit, the latter which pays 90% or her rent, something which combined practically speaking guarantees her intellectual independence. Daniella lives in a two-room apartment with a kitchenette and a patio as part of a staffed collective (group home) for people with neuropsychiatric disabilities with normal to high IQ (there are 5 apartments for single people in the collective) and she is served delicious homemade hot vegan food twice a day in addition to vegan breakfast and vegan evening meal. The collective is run according to Swedish disability rights legislation by the local municipality and is heavily subsidized. This includes the cost for the ingredients for the meals for which she does not pay in full. Daniella also has regional government funded free dental care due to her autism. Non-dental health care is funded by each regional government for all in Sweden through a regional income tax (it varies in the range of 10-13% depending on the region). Daniella also has access to a heavily subsidized regional government disability transport service due to her autism. Daniella has a personal fiduciary appointed by the court who takes care of paying her bills on her behalf and defends her legal interests. Daniella is visited at home every 30 days by a nurse who gives her an injection with antipsychotic medication and makes sure that she is well. Daniella is well taken care of in Sweden but nevertheless longs for Zion.  

Daniella cares deeply about her friends and is always trying to solve their problems. Unlike the stereotype of autistic people as introverts, Daniella is quite extroverted and generally socially competent and is unlike many autistic people excellent at reading others. Daniella finds it psychologically challenging to contact people on social media, including those whom she previously knows and this also due to her autism. Daniella is highly verbal and likes to converse. However, Daniella finds it psychologically challenging to keep secrets and this is due to her autism. Like many autistic people Daniella has a problem with eye contact, in Daniella’s case specifically a lack of understanding when and how prolonged eye contact becomes seductive and Daniella therefore tends to prematurely interrupt eye contact in order to avoid unintentionally seductive behavior. 

As a child did Daniella continue to read words letter-by-letter until second grade when her primary school mother used the evenings to teach her to read full words in Swedish. Daniella had no problem learning to read English, French and Italian since she already knew how to read the Latin alphabet although her understanding of Italian and French is very limited despite for years having studied those languages at school. Daniella still reads words letter-by-letter in Hebrew although she learned to recognize many full words in Hebrew, particularly those that are part of the main daily and Shabbat (Sabbath) prayers in the Siddur (Hebrew prayer book). Daniella speaks simple Hebrew with a limited vocabulary having completed the third semester in immigrant Hebrew study but peculiarly enough does not understand much when native Hebrew speakers talk to her in Hebrew. Also, she has not spoken much Hebrew since she left Israel in 1997 and so she has partially forgotten the language. Furthermore, while in school Daniella showed clear signs of dyscalculia in consistently making simple mathematical mistakes of the type 3+3=7 when making a more complex calculation in thus turning the outcome of the entire calculation incorrect. It would appear that those impairments are related to her autism. 

Daniella however does not lack talent for learning languages as she learned to speak first Australian English, then British English and finally American English; all three entirely without a Swedish accent. Daniella learned Australian English from watching Australia’s “Neighbours” show as a teenager on television. Daniella picked up British English while listening to BBC World Service during the 1990 Gulf War. Daniella only learned American English after spending five days in the United States as a guest of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) c. 2004. 

Daniella has experienced a number of psychotic episodes, after which she completely lost her faith in God and became an atheist although of course she still loves Judaism. When Daniella is psychotic does she believe that she is God, the Messiah and the head of state of all countries. Daniella is an ex-Orthodox Jew and she still misses being religious but she just can’t believe anymore after her psychotic experiences. Daniella’s paternal grandfather committed suicide by jumping to his death from a mental hospital in Israel. The brother of Daniella’s maternal grandmother suffered from mental illness for decades. Daniella recovered from her most recent psychotic episode in 2019 after having been severely psychotic for three years and mildly psychotic for at least an additional three years before that and has since suffered from post-psychotic autistic burnout. After recovering Daniella almost lost her ability to speak and became very quiet and Daniella still is not as talkative as she normally is. Daniella suffers from fatigue due to her autistic burnout and spends her days in bed resting, browsing and blogging.

Daniella’s most psychologically distressing disability is that due to her autism, she does not understand flirtation but instead reacts with confusion. (Daniella thinks: “How do I know if she is really interested in me?”) This is apparently both due to a deficit in ToM affecting her cognitive empathy and a similar deficit partially affecting her affective empathy.

As a proud lesbian ex-Orthodox Jew is Daniella only interested in halakhically Jewish women (whether rabbinically Jewish or Median Jewish) who have not converted to religious imperialism. Daniella is interested in online meeting a Jewish woman living in Israel as she is interested in returning to Israel. Daniella loves and is open to women of all Jewish ethnicities but has a personal (racial-sexual) preference for Mizrahi Jewish women and in particular Yemenite Jewish women. 

What are Daniella’s other preferences in a woman? Daniella values a female partner also being an intellectual secular “chavruta” in being intelligent, intellectually curious and having her own intellectual interests. Also Daniella would like someone who is reproductive age. Daniella would like to find someone who is similar to herself in being warm, altruistic and intellectual. Daniella’s ultimate dream (which is perhaps unattainable) would be to find a fellow hereditary genius or at least someone with those genes who comes from a family with hereditary geniuses. What behavioral traits do Daniella admire in women? Daniella is a feminist and is attracted to women with feminist behavioral traits who are socially and sexually assertive and proactive, both in bed and in social life. Daniella likes and appreciates women who know what they want and know how to get it and don’t take a no for a no. It is important to understand that when Daniella says ‘no’ she rarely means it, although she sometimes does.

Daniella is a nasophile in finding women with crooked noses extremely attractive. However, this is rare to find nowadays since most such females in wealthy countries undergo plastic surgery to straighten their noses already in their teens. Daniella herself is rather hairy (something which is quite uncomfortable to her as a transfeminine person and makes it quite unrealistic to daily shave/trim much of the body) yet she is completely sexually turned off by female body hair, including female pubic hair. Daniella like many other LGBTQIA+ people maintains scrupulous anal hygiene in fully emptying and cleaning her anus after defacating. 

Daniella strongly prefers if a prospective female partner is vegan or at least is willing to eat vegan food at home but this is not an absolute requirement. This is both a practical issue of not having to cook separate foods as well as an issue of having shared values. For Daniella, veganism is the ethical foundation in life. A non-vegan human is simply not a moral person and therefore lacks moral integrity although Daniella respects non-vegans as morally weak human beings. Daniella does not drink, smoke or use recreational drugs and is not interested in women who do other than consuming kiddush wine (sabbath ritual wine). Furthermore, Daniella does not snore and is not interested in women who do.

Unlike many autistic people Daniella is socially competent and good at reading others and with the exception of flirtation knows intuitively how to socially interact IRL. Many autistic people find social media easier as they are not socially expected to read others but for Daniella is the reverse true. Daniella is confident IRL with its (to her) obvious social conventions but is much less confident in the online world where social conventions are much less apparent to her. Daniella finds it stressful and disconcerting to interact with others online without being able to read them IRL. Despite Daniella’s difficulties with social media, Daniella prefers getting to know someone for romance online before meeting her IRL due to the advantage provided in being able to delay Daniella’s responses and thus avoiding inadvertently rejecting someone due to misunderstandings because of not understanding flirtation. Daniella has a long history of inadvertently by misunderstanding rejecting women who are interested in her.

One common conception about autistic people is that they are unable to lie, manipulate and deceive. This is not true for Daniella who just hates to lie, manipulate and deceive but like those on the Dark Triad is naturally highly skilled and quite persuasive at doing so. Daniella is highly conscientious in interpersonal relations and so lying, manipulating and deceiving causes her psychological hardship unless of course this is fully morally justified. Many people have the idea that it is somehow “dangerous” to be transparent about themselves, while Daniella believes that it is psychologically healthy and quite socially helpful to be optimally transparent about oneself. Similarly, does Daniella strongly believe that lying, manipulation and deception, although sometimes necessary and morally justified, must be kept to an absolute minimum in life.

Daniella, as a disabled person with dual Swedish and Israeli citizenship has remained in Sweden for decades despite wanting to live in Israel as the Israeli welfare state is much less generous than the Swedish one. Moving to Israel as a single person would throw her into deep poverty if she were to subside on an Israeli disability pension and the only potential employer in Israel for Daniella as a Jewish genius (nearly all Jewish geniuses in Israel are employed by the intelligence sector) is the Mossad and Daniella finds it very difficult and painful indeed to keep secrets and is partially unable to although not entirely so. Daniella’s dream however would be to find employment at an Israeli foreign policy think tank although in principle she could work as a consultant finding innovative solutions to difficult conceptual and business problems. However, she lacks formal credentials and an academic degree although being quite well-known in the intelligence world.

What is the issue with Daniella not being able to keep secrets? Daniella has an intense psychological need to “debrief” and talk about her “secrets” if suitable publicly such as in this bio or else confidently with a trusted person and no doubt that is deeply human but this is exacerbated by Daniella’s uber-honest autistic personality. Daniella would be able to work in intelligence and keep secrets if she had a trusted person to confide in which usually is the role of a handler but is sometimes a psychologist or even a friend or a spouse who is a fellow agent. Yet it cannot be disregarded that successfully keeping secrets causes Daniella psychological suffering to varying degrees unless she has someone to confide in.

Daniella failed in her university studies due to her difficulties in reading printed books as due to her ADHD she is distracted by the fibers in the paper. She studied Arab studies, Comparative religion, Islamic studies and Law at Stockholm University and Gender studies at Linköping University and did a preparatory year at Bar-Ilan University. She also failed in menial work because she was considered too slow. In the winter of 1993-94 she worked at a McDonald’s restaurant in Stockholm but was fired after two months due to being too slow. When she studied Modern Hebrew in Israel in 1994 she lived and worked at Kibbutz Gal On in central Israel and worked part-time in the kibbutz factory but they were dissatisfied with her work and apparently for being too slow. This perceived, relative slowness is expressive of autistic slow motor skills. Since Daniella has no university degree and cannot do menial work, she is completely dependent on her disability pension and her housing benefit. While working in the intelligence world in theory would be ideal for Daniella (this is in practice her only possible employment option) this is problematic as it could compromise her independence as an intellectual and a writer. Furthermore, her difficulties in keeping secrets makes this an even more problematic option. However, Daniella would not be able to work regular office hours due to her highly irregular sleeping patterns (she has an undiagnosed sleeping disorder likely related to her ADHD) although she could in principle work digitally on a distance from home. Daniella received exemptions from military service in both Sweden and Israel as this was years before her advanced cognitive skills were internationally discovered. Daniella once tried to learn to drive but found it a dizzying experience and never tried again.

Daniella is a trans woman and would certainly have preferred to have been born in a cis-female body, yet does not want to undergo the multiple-years process leading to gender affirmation surgery due to the immense inconvenience involved to her as a neuropsychiatrically disabled person with the entire process. If the process was shorter and easier would she however want to undergo gender affirmation surgery. As Daniella currently does not experience gender dysphoria other than desiring labial rubbing rather than coitus would Daniella also not clinically speaking qualify for gender affirmation surgery.

Daniella suffers from coitophobia (fear of coitus) which in Daniella is expressed in a number of ways. 1) Daniella cannot make herself fantasize about performing coitus on a woman (when she tries to imagine coitus, the act is preventively mentally erased, i.e. censored). 2) Daniella engages in involuntary compulsive rejection of women whom she is attracted to. 3) Daniella suffers from on occasion mild anxiety and irrational thoughts with respect to real scenarios that could even remotely lead to coitus. 4) Daniella has an autopilot which is a powerful counterforce to her libido and is actually stronger than her libido. The autopilot as subconsciously driven by coitophobia takes over to prevent relationships from forming and anything happening that could conceivably lead to coitus. The coitophobic autopilot takes over Daniella’s mind with irrelevant, yet emotionally and cognitively highly persuasive reasons and leads Daniella astray to “protect” her from eventually engaging in coitus. This is expressive of the defense mechanism of avoidance, also known as “avoidance behavior”. Daniella has developed such an self-awareness of her coitophobia that she is now able to instantly identify and mentally “nullify” coitophobic thoughts when they appear. However, she used to be almost completely enslaved to her coitophobia in almost always letting her coitophobia dictate relationship decisions. However, her coitophobia puts Daniella into a state of inner conflict between her libido and her anti-libido and so makes it difficult to think clearly and thus makes her quite confused. Daniella’s coitophobic autopilot is essentially sabotage dressed up as excuses.

Daniella has for most of her life been severely confused about her sexuality. On the one hand does she desire erotic intimacy (including genital rubbing which is not very practical while having phallus and testicles) with women but is mentally (but not physically) uncomfortable with the idea of sexually penetrating women. This is because at her core as a trans woman is she a lesbian and would be far more comfortable with having vagina and labia and perform genital rubbing with other women rather than penetrating them. Despite being sexually attracted to women is she so mentally uncomfortable with performing penetration that she cannot make herself fantasize about performing coitus on a woman. On the other hand does she have no problem fantasizing about being penetrated by a man in a vagina that she does not have despite only rarely being sexually attracted to men. While Daniella does experience only mild sexual attraction combined with strong aesthetic attraction towards many female strangers is Daniella not easily turned on. Situations of casual sex produce at best semi-erection and Daniella needs to form a strong emotional bond in order to be turned on and to be seriously sexually aroused by a physically present sexually attractive person. While not being demisexual does Daniella in this respect resemble demisexuals who do not experience sexual attraction until they form a strong emotional bond with a person. Daniella is in practice able to have sex only once a day since the second time becomes quite painful, i.e. if she ejaculated the first time and this is normal and not pathological according to a physician with whom she consulted.

Daniella is oversensitive to being caressed during sex and reacts with trembling. Daniella suffers from phobia for kissing (philemaphobia) and does not want to kiss mouth-to-mouth for hygienic reasons although this may not apply if she has developed a strong emotional bond. Daniella is graysexual, i.e. belongs to the spectrum between sexuality and asexuality with certain similarities to demisexuals. However, it is not difficult for Daniella to develop a strong emotional bond with someone, particularly if the person is aesthetically attractive. Daniella could possibly learn to appreciate coitus if she developed a romantic relationship with someone that she is strongly sexually attracted towards, this is a big unknown as Daniella has never performed coitus on someone that she was strongly sexually attracted towards. 

Daniella finds most pornography repulsive and tasteless but is turned on by pornography with artistic (literary or cineastic) qualities irrespective of subgenre of sexual specialization. Daniella has in her life had almost no sexual fantasies (at present none) and would certainly not find it sexually arousing to realize those that she had unless with someone whom she has developed a very close emotional bond. The same is true with pornographic scenarios which Daniella are turned on by. Daniella is most prominently turned on by bisexual erotic stories (man-woman, woman-woman and man-man) featuring group sex but it is very uncertain whether she would be interested in group sex IRL. Daniella has never been turned on by any gay cineastic porn although she has not watched much gay porn and so has perhaps not yet encountered quality gay porn.

While generally being lesbian in terms of which humans she is sexually attracted to, she is slightly bisexual with respect to persons from the greater Middle East (more specifically she is moderately aesthetically and sometimes sexually attracted to young Middle Eastern men) and this is a racial sexual preference as she has a general (although not exclusive) racial-sexual preference for persons from the greater Middle East. However, she is certainly lesbian in that she is only interested in a committed relationship with a fellow woman, i.e. Daniella is unequivocally lesbian in her romantic orientation. At present is Daniella not particularly interested in sex and is primarily looking for a partner to share life with but this disinterest in sex may potentially change if she finds the right woman to bond and connect with. 

Daniella is also (as is indeed very common among adults) sexually attracted to teenage girls from age 15 as well as sometimes to Middle Eastern teenage age boys from age 15. The age of consent is 15 in Sweden. Please note that sexual attraction to teenagers is by definition not pedophilia as the clinical definition of pedophilia is primary or exclusive sexual attraction to children below the age of 13. Primary sexual attraction to ages 15-19 is known as ephebophilia, however this is not a primary sexual orientation for Daniella. What are Daniella’s views on pedophilia? While small non-representative samples of qualitative studies suggest that adult intergenerational sex with children under 13 is traumatizing, large-size quantitative studies with representative college samples consistently show the opposite result and must therefore be relied on as the qualitative studies are biased in selection and show mere correlation. 

Daniella believes that children must be given the right to divorce their parents and be given new parents of their own choice or the option of living in youth collectives akin to the children’s homes in Israeli kibbutzim. Age of consent laws must be substantially reformed so that they both protect children from sexual exploitation and protect the sexual agency of children to engage in informed sex with whomever they choose on their own volition. Many children are sexually active long prior to the age of consent and not necessarily with age peers. When Daniella was a sexually innocent pubescent 14-year old was she subjected in her own home to a sophisticated, advanced and socially intrusive attempt at seduction by an apparently sexually experienced prepubescent 11-year old girl who performed advanced striptease and rubbed her partly removed stockings between her labia. This was deeply confusing to the young Daniella who didn’t think that prepubescent children had sexualities but this later sparked a scientific interest in those issues in Daniella.

It is noteworthy that many children below the age of 13 are effectively pedophiles since they are sexually attracted to fellow children. 5% of all adult males are clinical pedophiles and despite being widely demonized are nearly all of them strictly law-abiding with respect to age of consent laws and child pornography laws and therefore deserve only respect and admiration. The majority of sex offenders violating age of consent laws are not clinical pedophiles and most adults who commit incest with children are non-pedophiles. This is due to the fact that adult sexual attraction towards children below the age of 13 is apparently quite widespread in the adult male human population and is far from limited to clinical pedophiles.

The following is a breakdown of Daniella’s dimensions of attraction:

Sexual attraction: Women, teenage girls and sometimes young Middle Eastern men and Middle Eastern teenage boys, only very extremely rarely young non-Middle Eastern men and almost never men of other ages.

Romantic attraction: Only women

Aesthetic attraction: Women, teenage girls, young Middle Eastern men, Middle Eastern teenage boys and sometimes men of other ages. Like nearly all adults, Daniella is aesthetically attracted to children (i.e. thinking that children are “cute”), indeed this is the evolutionary basis of parenthood. Daniella is similarly like many other humans aesthetically attracted to many animals, also due to being “cute”.

Sensual attraction (i.e. desire to hug): Only women and teenage girls

Emotional attraction: All genders 

Intellectual attraction: All genders

Social attraction: Persons of all genders, ages and races whom Daniella already knows.

Platonic attraction: Daniella rarely experiences platonic attraction but has formed a few strong platonic friendships in her life, two with males and one with a woman.

How does Daniella know whether her level of experience of attraction is mild, moderate or strong? This is both an empirical and comparative problem since it is difficult to know to what degrees others experience attraction. However, Daniella knows that she experiences mild sexual attraction towards women whom she does not know, moderate sexual attraction towards women whom she is acquainted with and that she in one single case experienced strong sexual attraction towards a woman with whom she had formed a strong emotional bond. She furthermore knows that she experiences strong aesthetic attraction towards women but only moderate aesthetic attraction towards young Middle Eastern men. 

Despite being sexually attracted to relatively few men has Daniella’s very few sexual fantasies in recent years exclusively focused on men and has been devoted to being anally and orally penetrated while wearing women’s clothes as well as kissing and being vaginally penetrated after fully having undergone gender affirmative surgery.

What should a woman interested in Daniella be cognizant of? First, Daniella will be looking for various more or less (ir)rational excuses to reject her unless they have already formed a strong emotional bond. Therefore, flirting is a danger zone, is very strongly discouraged and leads inexorably to inadvertent rejection by Daniella. It is essential to first be friends online before commencing a video chatting relationship and meeting IRL is yet further down the road. The first time they meet IRL should be for at most a weekend and the second time (Daniella is interested in meeting a Jewish woman living in Israel with an eye to returning to Israel) would be a social experiment of living together for at most a month without sex aimed at building a strong emotional bond. If Daniella feels strong sexual attraction towards the woman at the end of the month has the experiment succeeded and the relationship can become permanent if there is also romance. Just as for demisexuals is it essential to develop a close emotional bond. These are the effective rules of the game because Daniella is genuinely hard to get and not because Daniella wants so but simply because that’s the way she is. This is all about building a relationship involving a close emotional bond and avoiding inadvertent rejection by Daniella. Since Daniella’s sexual profile is somewhat similar to demisexuals does not the theory of the danger of so-called friendzoning apply. On the contrary, “friendzoning” is essential for the stage of Daniella developing moderate sexual attraction for a woman. Indeed, devoloping strong sexual attraction will require living together for weeks up to a month without sex. Daniella is a straightforward person in terms of personality but certainly not sexually so. That is the reality and this is certainly not a reality that Daniella appreciates (far from that as it is extremely cumbersome) but this is the way it is. Daniella does not mind kissing as long as it does not involve exchange of saliva, something which she is severely phobic about and finds disgusting and Daniella thus suffers from philemaphobia. Daniella’s horror at female body hair (particularly long armpit hair) is also not normal and constitutes a phobia.

At about age 30 in Stockholm Daniella was offered a shidduch (Jewish matched marriage) with a ten year younger attractive woman. Daniella at the time was practicing Modern Orthodox Judaism in a partially observant (traditional) community. Daniella met the woman at a bashow (sit-in) prior to a Friday night Shabbat (Sabbath) dinner at the home of the liberal Modern Orthodox rabbi as the rendez-vous was arranged. The two did not speak however and Daniella did not even know her name. Days later did the young woman’s father approach Daniella in synagogue and asked Daniella if Daniella wanted to marry his daughter. Daniella was confused since Daniella did not know the young woman. They had not even exchanged words and even so had the woman apparently consented to marrying Daniella only based on Daniella’s physical appearance. Daniella was furthermore not familiar with the shidduch/bashow customs of the small Orthodox-traditionalist community in Stockholm where marrying total strangers with significant age difference apparently is the norm due to young people being desperate to marrying someone Jewish and nominally Orthodox. The woman’s father offered Daniella a job in his business after graduation and Daniella felt slightly ashamed since her university studies were a mess with no prospects of succeeding. Daniella knew that she had no prospects of supporting a family , purchasing an apartment and despite finding the young woman highly attractive did not say yes to the offer since Daniella felt that Daniella herself was “damaged goods”. All these arguments were obviously expressive of coitophobic avoidance. Avoidance is in fact a defense mechanism although rarely being recognized as such.

It is important to understand that aesthetic attraction is very important when trying to attract Daniella because she compensates strong aesthetic attraction for the very mild sexual attraction that she experiences for unfamiliar women. Of course, the closer the relationship the less important aesthetic attraction becomes but it must be emphasized how important it is, particularly initially. E.g. is Daniella turned on by makeup and tight clothes. Of course, aesthetic attraction is superficial but it is nevertheless real.

Daniella is diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Daniella has experienced varying degrees of gender dysphoria during her life, including often none. Although Daniella identifies as female does she at present not experience any distress as a result of this other than wanting labial rubbing (which is not possible without gender affirmation surgery) rather than coitus. Daniella played with dolls as a child and had her own homemade dollhouse. 

When Daniella was fifteen years old she held a public lecture about schools not adhering to the legislated Swedish curriculum (then Lgr 80) to a packed local public auditorium after receiving extensive publicity in the local media.

What are Daniella’s attitude towards children? Daniella is very good with children, likes children and also feels a strong obligation to procreate so as to transmit her hereditary genius to the next generation. However, Daniella is sensorially oversensitive to sound due to her autism and would therefore find it difficult to cope with screaming infants and loud toddlers although it is true that different individual young children are loud to different degrees with some being quite quiet.

What are Daniella’s views of eugenics and is it even ethical for herself to reproduce? Daniella is opposed to negative (selectively repressive) eugenics and nationalist (racist) eugenics but favors positive (selectively reproductive) eugenics and international (pro-miscegenation) eugenics. Daniella favors paying women both domestically and in developing countries (as sperm aid) for receiving inseminations with semen from extremely high IQ donors of all genetic origins. Daniella’s autism and ADHD are no ethical obstacles to reproduction from a eugenic perspective but it could be argued that her genetic predisposition for mental illness is. However, since Daniella is opposed to negative eugenics does Daniella oppose limiting the reproduction of the disabled and so it would be distinctly hypocritical for herself to refrain from reproducing. Furthermore, it is a moral imperative to promote the reproduction of hereditary geniuses and members of genius families should be matched with each other for marriage. The study of genius families was initiated by Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911), himself a genius, but has since alas been neglected. Of course, in many cases is genius a side effect of genes for disorders of the mind but not necessarily so, as in Daniella’s case does her genius not appear to be caused by her psychiatric/neuropsychiatric conditions. Daniella feels distinctly bad about not having produced any offspring and strongly feels that it is a moral imperative for her as a hereditary genius to reproduce.

Why does Daniella want to return to Israel? As a Zionist does Daniella strongly believe that all Jews should live in Israel. Daniella feels complete as a person in Israel and she is eager to reproduce and form a family there as she feels ashamed for not having children despite being a hereditary genius. In practice would it be difficult for Daniella to permanently return to Israel without first finding employment in the intelligence sector where she would be able to greatly contribute thanks to her exceptional hereditary genius. When she lived in Israel in the period of 1994-97 everything was arranged for her by the Jewish Agency and other bodies. It would also be difficult for Daniella to now settle in Israel as a single person considering her disabilities. Daniella wants to contribute more and although she significantly does help strengthen Israeli national interests from Sweden through her extremely effective diplomatic advocacy, there is in fact much more that Daniella can do to contribute to the Israeli national effort.

Daniella is a great believer in optimal transparency in all dimensions of human life and is highly open about herself to all. Daniella has been an ethical vegan since 1997 and became a health vegan as early as in 1987 at a time when veganism was very uncommon and Daniella was only 13 years old although her health veganism only lasted for a few years.

Daniella consistently practises moral courage. She is not afraid to publicly state controversial and unconventional standpoints and this is in part due to both her autism and her ADHD. Daniella understands that effective democratic statesmanship precisely requires both moral courage and the ability to do the unconventional. While it is impossible to be a moral purist, it is nevertheless essential to strike a balance between realpolitik and the democratic interest in statesmanship. Daniella is however aware that she could anytime pay the highest price for her moral courage as she could be assassinated by Iranian intelligence should they so decide.

Daniella is a human chameleon in her diplomatic advocacy as she effectively “switches nationality” as of need. Daniella adopts the interests of the government that she is focused on and argues passionately and innovatively for its own interests from its own perspectives. Of course this is about combining interests of more than one government, including usually Israel, but this is the essence of diplomacy. It has been argued by scientists that perspective-taking is impaired in autistics but in Daniella is perspective-taking particularly advanced to the degree that Daniella creeps into the skin of other ethnic groups, nations, states and religions.

As a teenager did Daniella study language geography and is therefore highly knowledgeable not only about the geographic distribution of languages worldwide (with at the time a special interest in African languages) but is also familiar with intersecting issues such as religion, ethnicity, political history, demography and political geography. Daniella has photographic memory for maps, including language maps. Daniella is however specialized in at depth understanding of the Middle East.

How does Daniella feel about her life? Daniella has long since attained her dream of becoming a neoconservative intellectual in frequently influencing US foreign policy under all US presidential administrations since 2002 and sometimes also the foreign policies of other governments as well. She has thus attained self-actualization to an unusual degree. Yet, she is far from satisfied, because she feels that she is intellectually underchallenged as only some 2% of her wake time is spent on diplomatic advocacy. Daniella feels that literally 98% of her awake time is going to waste when there is so much more that she could contribute in terms of intellectual innovation/exploration/adaptation. Yet Daniella has so far proven unable to realize her other dreams of returning to Israel and forming a Jewish family due to her various disabilities. What about her political initiatives? Those have mostly become implemented although her vision of returning Median Jewry to Israel of course is the great challenge awaiting Zionism and Israel. 

Daniella was born in Sweden to a Romanian-born Jewish father and a secular Lutheran Swedish mother. Daniella converted to Judaism as a young adult. Daniella first underwent a Conservative conversion in Stockholm which was recognized as valid by the Modern Orthodox rabbi of Stockholm as Daniella became Orthodox and observant. Daniella subsequently underwent an Ultra-Orthodox giyur lechumra (literally “strict conversion”) at the Chief Rabbinate in Jerusalem. Daniella’s years as Orthodox in Israel and Sweden were the best years in her life but due to her experience of psychosis she completely lost her faith and became an atheist.

Why does Daniella want a relationship with a woman who is a halakhically Jewish? Daniella is not interested in marrying religiously since she has long since left religion and furthermore identifies as transfeminine so would be uncomfortable to play the role of the groom but she is concerned that her children be recognized as Jewish. Why so? For Daniella is her own mixed ancestry as being born from a non-Jewish mother and a Jewish father profoundly traumatic. Daniella wants her children to grow up in Israel since she realizes that raising Jewish children in the Diaspora outside Orthodoxy is a recipe for assimilation and intermarriage in the next generation. Daniella wants halakhically Jewish children because she doesn’t want her children to experience her own trauma of having a question mark over her own Jewish identity and that can only be attained through a halakhically Jewish biological mother. Daniella could not under any circumstance marry or be the partner of someone belonging to a different religion.

What is Daniella’s views on sexual politics? Daniella understands that heterosexualities and monogamy are temporal social constructions conditioned by historical economic contingencies. If we were socially conditioned to live our lives in pansexual in polyamory, we certainly would. Daniella therefore believes that televised entertainment and education must be transformed to prepare future generations for the new norm of pansexual polyamory. Most Western men will sleep with a woman they find reasonably aesthetically appealing without being sexually attracted to her but they don’t apply the same standard to men whom they find goodlooking. This is different in parts of the Arab world (e.g. Saudi Arabia and Syria) where it is extremely common for heterosexual men to have sex with other men and where they will simply apply the same standard to men. There are other examples of this, e.g. the common contemporary practice of a gay couple inviting a lesbian for a threesome or a lesbian couple inviting a gay man for a threesome. It is quite common in Sweden for heterosexual women to experiment with what is known as galsex (Swedish: tjejsex), namely heterosexual women having sex with each other, sometimes with a male participant. The point is that exclusive heterosexuality is a social construct as is monogamy. These social constructs are severely limiting and completely unfit for our time and age. It ought to be pointed out that Daniella is neither pan nor poly, Daniella’s point is that these are social constructions and that it is up to us to redesign and reengineer the future. How then do Daniella’s political views align with her sexuality? Daniella does not really know her sexuality, it appears to still be a black box. The problem is that her sexuality rarely reveals itself.

The Torah says “lo tov lehiot levad” (it is not good to be alone) and spending most wake time alone with cyberspace creates a certain amount of anxiety in Daniella. Social media tends to create anxiety in Daniella as does short periods abstaining from blogging. Daniella recognizes that it is not healthy to spend nearly all wake hours alone and understands the value of companionship. However, she also understands the importance of there being an intellectual dimension of a relationship, meaning that there is mutual intellectual stimulation in an intimate relationship. That’s yet another meaning of “lo tov lehiot levad” since it is possible to be intellectually alone in an otherwise intimate relationship.

What are Daniella’s views on matchmaking? Daniella believes that scientific psychometric testing could be harnessed to produce highly accurate matching in large online populations. Thus would it become statistically possible for singles to find their soulmate through psychometric mass matching, including testing preferences for physical features. Daniella believes that this should be realized on a large scale for Diaspora Jewry to resolve the crisis of intermarriage and thus prevent the otherwise inevitable disappearance of Diaspora Jewry. This service should be provided for free by the State of Israel in order to halt the rampant assimilation among the Jewish Diaspora worldwide.

Daniella’s paternal grandparents (Herman and Aneta Bartfeld) immigrated to Israel in 1948 and Daniella has two Israeli cousins, Amos Ron and Gadi Singer. Daniella’s journalist father Avram Bartfeld (a Holocaust survivor) changed his name to Andrei Bart in Communist Romania. Daniella’s father lost his job as the managing editor of a major newspaper in Romania after having applied for permission to immigrate to Israel and was as many other Romanian Jews later allowed to emigrate after the US government paid the Romanian regime to let Romanian Jews leave for Israel. Daniella’s late father immigrated to Sweden in 1968 after two years as stateless in Italy together with Daniella’s Romanian-born half-brother after having declined to immigrate to Israel due to a feud with an Israeli rabbi in a Jewish Agency transitory refugee camp in southern Italy and who told him not to smoke on Shabbat (the Sabbath), something which infuriated Daniella’s father and caused him to hitchhike to Rome together with his son. Although Daniella’s legal name is Daniel Bart does she use the online name Daniella Bartfeld due to being transgender. (Bartfeld is the German name of the Slovak city of Bardejov and is also an Ashkenazi Jewish surname.) Everyone calls her Daniella. Daniella’s pronouns are ‘she’ and ‘her’. Daniella used to wear women’s clothes daily with makeup and a pink wig but no longer does so since 2019 due to suffering from burnout.

You have now read Daniella’s constantly evolving psychological biography which she commenced writing, editing and publishing on February 16, 2022 and has been growing daily ever since. Daniella believes that all adult humans should be encouraged to write their own psychological biography and preferably as early as possible in life. When Daniella commenced writing her psychological biography did she believe that she knew herself well but has since come to learn so much about herself that she did not have full awareness of. Daniella believes that senior high school students should all be enabled to write their own psychological biographies so as to enable them to make better life choices. Daniella plans to treat her three sexual phobias (coitus, female body hair and kissing involving exchange of saliva) in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).